How Does Emergency Contraception Work?
How does emergency contraception work? Glad you asked. Let's take a look at the available evidence.
First, some [oversimplified] basics.
What is emergency contraception (EC)?
EC is a group of birth control methods; the postcoital one, to be more exact. When you use a method from another group--an implant, the condom, Persona, sterilization--you use the method before, or during intercourse. When you use an EC method, you use it after you've already had sex. Again, what distinguishes the EC group from the other birth control groups is the timing of use. EC is postcoital (after sex) birth control; all the other methods are used before, or during intercourse:
An emergency contraceptive method is any drug or device used after an unprotected intercourse to prevent an unwanted pregnancy. It is, thus, a method that is used after coitus [sex] but before pregnancy occurs and is, therefore, not an abortifacient.
What are some of the methods in the EC group?
There are two types of EC methods: pills, and intrauterine devices (IUDs). The EC pills (ECPs) can be further subdivided into: high-dose estrogen; estrogen/progesterone (the combination Pill; Yuzpe regimen); progestin-only (Plan B); mifepristone (Mifeprex; RU486); etc. [Our discussion focuses on the pill methods.]:
Trials on emergency contraception were first described in the 1930s using high doses of stilbestrol. In the late 1970s, Yuzpe introduced a regimen consisting of 0.1 mg ethinylestradiol [estrogen] and 0.5 mg levonorgestrel [progestin], given within 72 h of the intercourse and repeated after 12 h.
The "Yuzpe" regimen basically entails using your regular brand of combination birth control pills on a modified, emergency contraception, regimen.
LNG [levonorgestrel] alone [Plan B] has been widely used in contraceptive formulations and has been used successfully for postcoital contraception as well. Higher efficacy and fewer side effects have been recorded when compared to the earlier method using an estrogen-gestagen combination [the "Yuzpe" regimen, or combination Pill]. A large multicenter study comparing the two regimens have shown LNG to prevent about 85% of the expected pregnancies if no other method was used.
Recently, treatment with levonorgestrel-only [Plan B] and mifepristone [Mifeprex, RU486] has emerged as the most effective hormonal methods with very low side effects.
An aside about mifepristone [Mifeprex, RU486]: Its mechanism of action is dose-, and regimen-dependent. When used as a single low dose ECP (older dosage 600 mg; current one, 10 mg), it acts as birth control and prevents pregnancy.
Theoretically, how should EC work to prevent a pregnancy?
Unprotected intercourse may occur at any time during the menstrual cycle but it is only during a limited period, from about 5 days before to 1 day after ovulation* that it may result in a pregnancy. To be effective, postcoital treatment could theoretically target one or several of the following events: sperm transport and function, follicular development [egg maturation, inside the ovary], ovulation, fertilization, embryo development and transport, implantation or the corpus luteum [what's left of the follicle, after the egg has been expelled; essential for early pregnancy support].
*[Recall that sperm may survive in the female reproductive tract for up to five days, and the mature egg may be fertilized over a 24-hour period.]
Second, let's look at what the studies tell us about ECP's mechanism of action.
How does EC work, in real life?
Human and animal studies have shown effects at several stages of the reproductive cycle: ovulation, fertilization, gamete transport, function of the corpus luteum and implantation.
The evidence shows ECPs work by preventing ovulation. There is no direct evidence they prevent fertilization. There's also no direct evidence they prevent implantation in humans.
Looking at ECPs' effect on:
Ovulation (release of mature egg from the ovary)
- inhibit or delay [established, main mechanism of action]
Fertilization (union of egg and sperm)
- no direct evidence for prevention [effect cannot be ruled out]
Gamete Transport
- no evidence of impaired transport in humans
Effects on the Function of the Corpus Luteum
- all pills disrupt this phase, however it is not known whether such changes are incompatible with pregnancy. [Better evidence for mifepristone vs. the other types of ECPs.]
Implantation (burrowing of a fertilized egg into uterus)
- ...although the postovulatory administration of estrogen or levonorgestrel inhibits implantation in some animals, evidence of similar
effects in women has been difficult to obtain. Minor changes in the histologic and biochemical features of the endometrium occur when high-dose estrogen, the estrogen/progestin combination, or danazol is administered after ovulation, but the effects may not be sufficient to inhibit implantation. In a recent morphometric study, postovulatory administration of estrogen plus progestin had only minor effects on the endometrium, and danazol had no effect.
- Mifepristone administered immediately after ovulation delays endometrial maturation
Bottom line:
...the proven mechanisms of action [of the hormones found in ECPs] consist of inhibiting or delaying ovulation.
and
An emergency contraceptive method is used after coitus but before pregnancy occurs....Recently, treatment with either 10 mg mifepristone [RU486] or 1.5 mg of levonorgestrel [~Plan B] has emerged as the most effective hormonal method for emergency contraception with very low side-effects. However, the knowledge of the mechanism of action of mifepristone and levonorgestrel in humans, when used for contraceptive purposes and especially for emergency contraception, remains incomplete.
...
When summarized, available data from studies in humans indicate that the contraceptive effects of both levonorgestrel and mifepristone, when used in single low doses for emergency contraception, involve either blockade or delay of ovulation, due to either prevention or delay of the LH surge, rather than to inhibition of implantation.
The last word goes to the NEJM (scroll to the bottom):
Use of emergency contraception is limited largely by ignorance. Although it seems likely that the estrogen/progestin regimen works mainly by interfering with ovulation, it is nevertheless regarded by many as an abortifacient because it is taken after, rather than before, intercourse. This confusion is compounded when mifepristone is advocated for emergency contraception since, when taken after pregnancy is established, it can be and is used for the induction of abortion. The prevention of pregnancy before implantation is contraception and not abortion. Intervention within 72 hours after intercourse cannot possibly amount to abortion, because implantation is not achieved until at least seven days after ovulation and the egg is capable of being fertilized for only about 24 hours.
Technorati Tags: emergency contraception, Plan B, contraception, birth control, reproductive health, health and wellness
[Pardon the abundance of tags; I've just discovered how to use them.]
Update: More here (via ourword)
Another Update: And make sure not to miss this post on Plan B from Pharyngula.







19 Comments:
Thanks for this. (I had to correct a post in which I made the "prevents implantation" mistake.)
Same here.. thank you for the research, and correcting a misunderstanding I've had for a while.
Point of clarification, if the egg is fertilized, and it would go on to be implanted and turn into a fetus, how is preventing implantation not abortion? It is life in progress, not an unfertilized or non-ovulated egg.
Point of clarification, if the egg is fertilized, and it would go on to be implanted and turn into a fetus, how is preventing implantation not abortion? It is life in progress, not an unfertilized or non-ovulated egg.
First, a couple of clarifications. The majority of fertilized eggs are spontaneously aborted, so if an egg is fertilized, most likely it will not go on to be implanted. Moreover, just because a fertilized egg implants, does not mean it will progress to the fetal stage.
Second, abortion is defined as the termination of a pregnancy. A pregnancy is established only after implantation. Preventing implantation isn't abortion because a pregnancy hasn't been established yet.
Third, I'm not sure what you mean by "life in progress"? Anatomically/physiologically, a germ cell is as much life in progress at its incipient stages at it is at later stages.
"Second, abortion is defined as the termination of a pregnancy."
This is just using terminology to avoid the ethical issue. If a fertilized egg is a morally protected human life, then intentionally causing it to fail to implant is murder, whether it is technically abortion or not.
In the same way, "The majority of fertilized eggs are spontaneously aborted" is avoiding the issue. There is a clear moral difference between causing life to end and that end occuring naturally. If one lived in a time when the majority of children died before age of 5, would it be morally acceptable to kill your child? Of course not.
And finally, "I'm not sure what you mean by 'life in progress'?" seems laughable. The abortion debate has long used the phrase "the beginning of life" to refer to morally protected souls, and aside from the occasional scoffer commenting on how a wart is living human cells, no one is confused by this.
Who are you? Like, a doctor or something? Only reason I ask is that your post on ECP's was really informative and I wanted to know where you got your information since it's difficult to find unbiased sources on this topic (the religious ones call it evil; Planned Parenthood of course advocates totally in favor). Anyway, your post made me feel really relieved. Thanks so much. :-)
anonymous,
This is just using terminology to avoid the ethical issue. If a fertilized egg is a morally protected human life, then intentionally causing it to fail to implant is murder, whether it is technically abortion or not.
Using correct terminology is essential, in the real world. There's a significant difference, in terms of risk of morbidity and mortality between preventing a pregnancy (no implantation yet), and terminating one (post implantation).
You need to define morally protected human life in the context of a fertilized egg.
In the same way, "The majority of fertilized eggs are spontaneously aborted" is avoiding the issue. There is a clear moral difference between causing life to end and that end occurring naturally.
No, it's actually correcting your statement that ...if the egg is fertilized, and it would go on to be implanted and turn into a fetus...
Because the majority of fertilized eggs are spontaneously aborted, if the egg is fertilized, it would most likely not go on to implant.
And finally, "I'm not sure what you mean by 'life in progress'?" seems laughable. The abortion debate has long used the phrase "the beginning of life" to refer to morally protected souls, and aside from the occasional scoffer commenting on how a wart is living human cells, no one is confused by this.
I aim to amuse! In any case, reality is not defined by the terminology used by assorted ideological debates. I mean, please, "soul"; what does that mean? And, just for the record, a wart is, indeed, living human cells.
Manda,
Thank you. (I'm an Ob/Gyn.)
I'm doing research on all of this at the moment. All of your comments have been useful. The one thing I can't figure out is this: why there is an issue with ECP preventing implantation, since Birth control (daily estrogen/progestin oral contraceptives) also prevents implantation? I was previously totally against ECP, but after looking into it, I'm not so sure. i'd love to hear responses from both sides if anyone is still out there. - pharmacist
Regardless of whether or not you are using the correct medical terminology, it is misleading for the non-medical lay person to say that emergency contraception does not cause aboortion when it may work at preventing the implantation of an already fertilized egg. Many people would have a problem with this and they have the right to know in order to make an informed decision.
i had my first period a day after i took ECP but I have not had my second period yet. Is it normal for the second period to be delayed by a week or so. My first period was normal.
Hello everyone! I m really not sure whether birth control pills delay period cycle or not?Let me explain what do I mean...For last 15 days I was taking Birth control pill to prevent pregnancy...that is I did sex with my husband on 31st Jan without Condom and I started to take pills from 2nd Feb,which I skipped on 3rd Feb and restarted from 4th Feb.From yesterday(18th Feb,)I have stopped taking pills as my period date was 17th Feb,which is over and period haven't stared yet,However,I don't think, I m pregnant as my husband didn't discharge sperm inside my Vagina and I don't have any symptoms of pregnancy...I just started taking pills to prevent any chance of becoming pregnent...now this is 20th Feb,but no period..why?Can anyone help me?
Pls help
Hi! not sure if I'm pregnat had last menstural cycle on 03/02/07 ended on 07/02/07. Had intercourse on 17/02/07,18/02/07 and 21/07/07 respectively. Then on 03/03/07. However I used the morning after pill Postinor-2 immediately after my last encounter. My period is now a little late not sure if its because of the use of the pill. Can you provide answers to this
hi. i have a question, i had unprotected sex on friday morning then later took the emergency after pills and following that i had sex with a condom, but it broke. he might of precumed, im not sure. but will the emergency after pills work for that night too? i got scared and took a pill of the birth control. but i really dont want to take birth control pills. please answer me back a.s.a.p
If EC works primarily by preventing ovulation, not by preveting implantation, what happens if you ovulated in the 24 hours BEFORE having sex? Your ovum can still be fertilised, am i correct? and so you just hope it doesn't implant?
thanks so much for this.! it's great to know some people are educated on the subject.
to those who think the *possibility* that a fertilized egg *MIGHT* be prevented from implantation=abortion, well, i hope they realize that our bodies naturally reject fertilized eggs from implanting all the time.
essentially the EC pills are ensuring our bodies will do something they do naturally on occasion anyway.
"The prevention of pregnancy before implantation is contraception and not abortion."
That is only if you accept the definition of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). They changed their definition of pregnancy back in the 60's so that they could call EC contraception and not an abortifacient. If you look at most other medical fields and practically any medical or common dictionary they still define pregnancy as beginning with fertilization NOT implantation. If that is the case, then EC's would be abortifacient...as would most methods of hormonal birth control.
Here are just a few sample definitions from medical dictionaries:
Mosby’s Medical dictionary, 7th Edition, (c) 2006
Conception (l, concipere, to take together), 1. The beginning of pregnancy, usually taken to be the instant that a spermatozoon enters an ovum and forms a viable zygote. 2. the act or process of fertilization
Pregnancy: The gestational process, comprising the growth and development within a woman of a new individual from conception through the embryonic and fetal periods to birth.
Stedman’s Medical Dictionary, 28th Edition, (c) 2006
Conception. 3. Fertilziation of oocyte by a sperm (latin conception; see concept)
Pregnancy: The state of the female after conception and until the termination of the gestation.
does ec works after 15 days ov intercross
Anon @ 12:23 AM,
No, it does not. ECPs work best if you take them as soon as possible after the act of unprotected intercourse, up to 120 hrs (5 days).
Anon @ 2:37 AM,
Your tactic of using dictionary definitions is noted but, even so, you do realize that I am bound by a blood oath to accept ACOG's, well pretty much anything, no?
On a more serious note, conceptus and pregnancy are not one and the same. One term refers to a bunch of tissues (embryo, membranes, and placenta), the other to a physiological state.
Also, as much as conspiracy theory moves like the one you mentioned are, you know, part of standard medical science, you'll no doubt be disappointed to find out that no such move was needed for ECPs. [See ECPs mechanism of action.]
Last, but no least, fertilization is not an instantaneous process, and its result is a bunch of totipotent cells.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home